candy ai and lucy are partially overlapping products with very different centers of gravity.
candy ai's center: image generation + character variety + NSFW. the UI surface reinforces it — galleries, photo-crops, crop-focus, subscription tiers that unlock more images. good at what it optimizes for.
lucy's center: chat depth + memory + voice + personality consistency. the UI surface reinforces it — conversation-first, personality descriptions over photos, memory visible at /settings/memory. good at what we optimize for.
who should stay on candy: users whose primary use is NSFW image generation, character variety over character depth, the specific candy community, avatar-customization workflow.
who should try lucy: users who feel the candy UI pushes them toward behavior they don't want (grid-picking, photo-first), who care about memory across sessions/weeks, who want real voice calls not just TTS voice messages, who need SFW at launch.
the honest middle-ground: you can run both. candy for image-first moments, lucy for memory-first daily presence. legitimate stack.
starting point on lucy: free tier is 25 msg/day + full memory + 3 trial photos/voice, no card. pick a companion by reading descriptions (not photos), talk for a week, see if the chat + memory feel right. if you miss the image-gallery vibe, candy is still there.